What Distinguishes a Trustee from an Instructed Delegate?

People chosen by the electorate to represent the people’s interests in the House of Representatives and the Senate are trustees and instructed delegates. They stand for two opposing perspectives regarding the function of representatives in governance.

A trustee uses his or her own judgement while making choices, while a delegate who has been given specific instructions uses constituent input.

Inclusion in Government

Despite the fact that people frequently and historically use the terms “democracy” and “republic” interchangeably, there are some differences between both forms of government. They both refer to systems of governance that are founded on popular sovereignty as opposed to monarchies and dictatorships, which provide a single person total control.

Every male citizen had the right to cast a ballot on significant matters in early democracies like The Athenian Assembly. Each voter was given the opportunity to express their views and comment on the issues they had to weigh. A simple majority decision was successful and established the rule of law. Republics, on the other hand, are forms of governance where the populace elects representatives to speak and vote for them.

Model of Trustee Representation

In a trustee form of representation, the electorate choose a representative they believe will act in their best interests. As a result, the trustee is free to vote according to his or her conscience or view rather than by asking the public for their opinion. Constituents effectively approve of the trustee’s actions while in office by electing them as trustee.

Model of Representation by Delegates

In the delegate model of representation, the people choose representatives whom they believe will carry out their wishes. According to this paradigm, the voters “fire” delegates who fall short of their standards by electing someone else during the election process. This is intended to keep delegates in close contact with their supporters so they are aware of how to vote on issues of policy.

Benefits and Drawbacks of the Trustee Model

In the trustee model, it is less likely that the majority will seize power. The trustee is allowed to decide what they think is in the best interests of the nation and its citizens. Before making decisions that best serve the interests of all parties involved, they should ideally spend their time researching the pertinent topics and weighing their various possibilities.

Even yet, it’s not always possible to accommodate everyone’s wants, which puts a lot of strain on the elected individual who must speak for a sizable group of people with frequently divergent interests.

Benefits and Drawbacks of the Delegate Model

Through the representatives they choose to represent them, the people can directly influence government under the delegate model. Ideally, they keep in touch with their delegates frequently.

However, if the delegates only hear from a small portion of the people they represent, this might also give the majority more power. Delegates who have received instruction must also cope with the difficulty of balancing the interests of the people with those of powerful organisations and their party.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Read More